Miller et al v. AutoZone, Inc. et al
Filing
30
ORDER TO PRO SE PLAINTIFFS UPON FILING OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. You are hereby notified that Defendant, AutoZone, Inc., filed with the Court on April 4, 2012, a motion for judgment on the pleadings in this case (Doc 29 ). Your response must be filed with the Court not later than April 30, 2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 4/5/12. (kje1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
MARY E. MILLER, et al.,
:
Plaintiffs,
-vs-
Case No. 3:11-cv-237
:
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
AUTOZONE, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
:
ORDER TO PRO SE PLAINTIFFS UPON FILING OF MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
You are hereby notified that Defendant, AutoZone, Inc., filed with the Court on April 4,
2012, a motion for judgment on the pleadings in this case [Doc # 29]. You should receive a copy
of the motion directly from the Defendant.
Under the rules of this Court (S.D. Ohio L.R. 7.2) you are allowed twenty-one days from the
date of service (April 4, 2012) within which to file a response to this motion, plus an extra three days
because of the way the motion was sent to you. Your response must be filed with the Court not later
than April 30, 2012.
April 5, 2012.
s/ Michael R. Merz
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?