Miller et al v. AutoZone, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. 31 ), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Complaint herein be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 5/21/12. (kje1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
MARY E. MILLER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

:
:

- vs AUTOZONE, Inc. et. al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 3:11-cv-237
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

:
:

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #31), to whom this case was referred pursuant to
28 U.S.C. ' 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time
for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said
Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Complaint herein be dismissed
with prejudice.

May 21, 2012

*s/THOMAS M. ROSE
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge