Howard v. Reid Hospital et al

Filing 31

DECISION AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on April 4, 2012 (Doc. 29 ) is ADOPTED in full. 2. Defendant Reid Hospital and Shannon Roshan's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED and this case DISM ISSED with prejudice as to these parties. 3. Reid Defendants' Motion to Strike and for Sanctions (Doc. 25 ) is DENIED.4. Reid Defendants' Motion to Designate Trial Attorneys (Doc. 19 ) is DENIEDas moot. 5. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis is denied. 6. The case remains pending on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 4/25/12. (kje1) Modified on 4/25/2012 to correct text(kje1).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
CORBIN J. HOWARD,

:

Plaintiff,

:

Case No. 3:11cv00287

:

District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington

vs.
REID HOSPITAL, et al.,

:

Defendants.

:

DECISION AND ENTRY

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of
United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #29), to whom this case was
originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been
filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has
expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

The Report and Recommendations filed on April 4, 2012 (Doc. #29) is
ADOPTED in full;

2.

Defendant Reid Hospital and Shannon Roshan’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #17)
is GRANTED and this case DISMISSED with prejudice as to these parties;

3.

Reid Defendants’ Motion to Strike and for Sanctions (Doc. #25) is DENIED;

4.

Reid Defendants’ Motion to Designate Trial Attorneys (Doc. #19) is DENIED
as moot;

5.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not

be taken in good faith, and consequently, leave for Plaintiff to appeal in forma
pauperis is denied; and,
6.

The case remains pending on the docket of this Court.

4/25/2012

*s/THOMAS M. ROSE

Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge

2