City of Dayton, Ohio v. A.R. Environmental, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER Denying Defendant Alex Penland's Motion (Doc. # 22 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 3/9/2012. (mdf1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
CITY OF DAYTON,
:

Case No. 3:11-cv-383

:

District Judge Walter Herbert Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Plaintiff,
-vs-

A.R. ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., et al.,

:

Defendants.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ALEX PENLAND’S MOTION (DOC. 22)

This Court recently denied pro se Defendant Alex Penland’s motion “to join Defendant’s
bonding company as a Defendant.” Doc. 20. Defendant Penland subsequently filed another motion,
which the Court liberally construes as a motion for reconsideration. Doc. 22. Again, Defendant
Penland has failed to show that the bonding company must be joined as a defendant in this action
under Civil Rule 19. Therefore, Defendant’s motion (doc. 22) is DENIED. Defendant Penland is
again directed to Civil Rule 14.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 9, 2012

s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge