City of Dayton, Ohio v. A.R. Environmental, Inc. et al

Filing 35

ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 4/5/2012. (mdf1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON CITY OF DAYTON, : Case No. 3:11-cv-383 : Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (consent case) Plaintiff, vs. A.R. ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., et al., : Defendants. ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS The Court has reviewed pro se Defendant Alex Penland’s Amended Third-Party Complaint1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and finds, at this early juncture in the litigation, that dismissal of that pleading is not warranted. Therefore, the United States Marshal (“USM”) is ORDERED to make service of process in this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) as follows: 1. The Clerk is ORDERED to mail Defendant Penland the required Summonses and USM Form 285's to serve the eight (8) named Third-Party Defendants. 2. Upon receipt of properly completed Summonses and USM Form 285's, the United States Marshal is ORDERED to serve copies of Documents 1, 12 and 33 on the following named Third-Party Defendants: C2 Diversified, Max Fuller, Steve Rauch Incorporated, Fitzgerald Murraine, Bill Oconnel, Michael Johnson, Michael Cromartie, and Mark Muller. 1 Defendant Penland first filed an “Amended Complaint for Cross Claims and Relief,” which the Court liberally construed to be a Third-Party Complaint. See doc. 12. He also filed a “Second Amended Complaint,” which the Court liberally construed as an Amended Third-Party Complaint. The subsequent pleading incorporated earlier pleadings, and added additional claims and facts. See docs. 12, 33. The Court reviewed both pleadings in its 28 U.S.C. § 1915 review. 3. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge April 5, 2012 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?