Mack v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -The Report and Recommendations filed on September 4, 2014 19 is ADOPTED in full, the Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees 18 is GRANTED, the Commissioner is directed to pay Plaintiff's attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) in the total amount of $22,000.00, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to reimburse Plaintiff the amount of EAJA fees $6,950.00 previously awarded to counsel and the case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 9-24-2014. (de)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
SHIRLEY MACK,
:
Plaintiff,
:
Case No. 3:12cv00115
vs.
:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration,
Defendant.
:
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
:
:
DECISION AND ENTRY
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States
Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #19), to whom this case was originally
referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed
thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has
expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendations filed on September 4, 2014 (Doc. #19) is
ADOPTED in full;
2. The Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees (Doc. #18) is GRANTED;
3. The Commissioner is directed to pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) in the total amount of $22,000.00;
4. Plaintiff’s counsel is directed to reimburse Plaintiff the amount of EAJA fees –
$6,950.00 – previously awarded to counsel; and
5. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
September 24, 2014
*s/Thomas M. Rose
_________________________
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?