Hill v. Rastatter et al

Filing 18

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 16 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. 17 ) OVERRULED; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(4) (DOC. 15 ). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 3/8/2013. (sc1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
ALPHONZO H. HILL,

Case No. 3:12-cv-173

Plaintiff,
District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

vs.
DOUGLAS M. RASTATTER, eta/.,
Defendants.

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #16)
IN ITS ENTIRETY; PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC.
#17) OVERRULED; AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(4) (DOC. #15)

Based upon the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by the United States
Magistrate Judge, in his Report and Recommendation, filed February 25, 2013 (Doc. #16), as well
as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, this Court adopts the
aforesaid Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and overrules Plaintiffs Objections (Doc.
#17) thereto.
Plaintiffs motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) (Doc. #15)
is denied. The above captioned case shall remain terminated upon the Court's docket.

March _8_, 2013
WALTER HERBERT RICE, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT