Christian v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 18 Plaintiff's MOTION for Allowance of Attorney Fees be granted; the Commissioner be directed to pay Plaintiff's attorney fees in the amount of $5,523.67; and the case remain terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 7/27/2015. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 7-9-15. (mcm1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DOROTHEA CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff, : : Case No. 3:12cv00194 vs. : CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS1 This case is before the Court upon the Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees filed by Plaintiff’s attorney. (Doc. #18). The Commissioner has neither responded to nor opposed the Motion, and the time for filing a Memorandum in Opposition has expired. See S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.2(a)(2). The Motion seeks an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b)(1) in the total amount of $5,523.67. In the absence of a response or opposition by the Commissioner, the Motion, Memorandum, and supporting Exhibits establish that an award of attorney fees is warranted under 42 U.S.C. §406(b)(1) in the amount the Motion seeks. 1 Attached hereto is a NOTICE to the parties regarding objections to this Report and Recommendations. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The Motion For Allowance Of Attorney Fees (Doc. #18) be GRANTED; 2. The Commissioner be directed to pay Plaintiff’s attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b)(1) in the amount of $5,523.67; and 3. The case remain terminated on the docket of this Court. July 9, 2015 s/Sharon L. Ovington Sharon L. Ovington Chief United States Magistrate Judge 2 NOTICE REGARDING OBJECTIONS Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within FOURTEEN days after being served with this Report and Recommendations. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), this period is extended to SEVENTEEN days because this Report is being served by one of the methods of service listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C), (D), (E), or (F). Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring of record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections within FOURTEEN days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?