Hudson Insurance Company v. GM Mechanical, Inc. et al
Filing
35
ORDER - Counsel for both sides asked the Court to extend the Discovery Deadline and all related dates 90 days. For good cause shown, this request is GRANTED and the Calendar is SO MODIFIED. This case, therefore, shall proceed as follows: Discovery Deadline: July 22, 2013; and Dispositive Motions Deadline: August 22, 2013. The status conference initially scheduled for June 18, 2013 is RESCHEDULED to September 18, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. A trial date will be scheduled, if appropriate, following the Court's ruling on summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 4/12/13. (kje1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY,
:
Plaintiff,
:
Case No. 3:12CV276
-vs-
:
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
(Consent Case)
GM MECHANICAL INC., et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
ORDER
This is a consent case for which the Court, on April 12, 2013, held an informal discovery
conference, by telephone, with counsel for both sides. Eric Kjellander, Esq. then appeared with
Lynnette Dinkler on behalf of Plaintiff, and Walter Reynolds, Esq. appeared on behalf of
Defendants. Mr. Kjellander, who was permitted to participate in the conference, is DIRECTED
to promptly file a motion to appear pro hac vice.
Counsel for both sides asked the Court to extend the Discovery Deadline and all related
dates 90 days. For good cause shown, this request is GRANTED and the Calendar is SO
MODIFIED. This case, therefore, shall proceed as follows:
Discovery Deadline: July 22, 2013; and
Dispositive Motions Deadline: August 22, 2013.
The status conference initially scheduled for June 18, 2013 is RESCHEDULED to
September 18, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. A trial date will be scheduled, if appropriate, following the
Court's ruling on summary judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 12, 2013
s/Michael J. Newman________
Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?