Saba v. U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, Ft Meade et al

Filing 22

AMENDED JUDGMENT BY CLERK 21 . (tt) Modified on 1/10/2014 to include hyper-link and reflect the filing will be sent via regular mail to plaintiff, along with Order, at the address listed on 1/13/2014 (tt).

AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Southern District of Ohio
__________ District of __________

NIDAL SABA
Plaintiff
Plaintiff

v.
U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE
AND SECURITY COMMAND, ET AL.,
Defendant
Defendant
AMENDED

)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-305
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

The court has ordered that (check one):
the plaintiff (name)
defendant (name)

recover from the
the amount of
), which includes prejudgment
%, along with costs.

dollars ($
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of

interest at the rate of

the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.

✔ other: Any claims made in the Complaint (1) for review of revocation or failure to grant Plaintiff a security clearance, (2) for
damages from before April 1, 2009, or (3) for damages against the United States for libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or
interference with contract rights are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment is entered by the Clerk to that effect, but said
.
judgment shall be without prejudice to any claims Mr. Saba may have against Interviewer 2-72777 or Investigator 2-A5718 in their
individual capacities under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), or against the appropriate
party for correction of his records under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 522a.
This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge
rendered a verdict.
tried by Judge
was reached.

✔ decided by Judge

presiding, and the jury has
without a jury and the above decision

Michael R. Merz

on a motion for

Dismissal filed by the Defendant's.

JOHN P. HEHMAN

Date:

01/10/2014

CLERK OF COURT

s/TEMPANN THOMAS
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Western
__________ DIVISION
NIDAL SABA
___________________________________
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
vs
U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE
___________________________________
AND SECURITY COMMAND, ET AL.,
Defendant
Defendant

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case Number: 3:12-cv-305

NOTICE OF DISPOSAL PER SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO LOCAL RULES
79.2(a)&(b)
01/10/2014
The above captioned matter has been terminated on ________________________.

If applicable to this case, the disposal date will be six (6) months from the above
termination date.
Rule 79.2(a) Withdrawal by Counsel:
All depositions, exhibits or other materials filed in an action or offered in evidence shall not be
considered part of the pleadings in the action, and unless otherwise ordered by the Court, shall be
withdrawn by counsel without further Order within six (6) months after final termination of the
action.
Rule 79.2 (b) Disposal by the Clerk
All depositions, exhibits or other materials not withdrawn by counsel shall be disposed of by the
Clerk as waste at the expiration of the withdrawal period.
JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK

s/TEMPANN THOMAS
By: _________________
Deputy Clerk