Saba v. U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, Ft Meade et al

Filing 22

AMENDED JUDGMENT BY CLERK 21 . (tt) Modified on 1/10/2014 to include hyper-link and reflect the filing will be sent via regular mail to plaintiff, along with Order, at the address listed on 1/13/2014 (tt).

Download PDF
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of Ohio __________ District of __________ NIDAL SABA Plaintiff Plaintiff v. U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND, ET AL., Defendant Defendant AMENDED ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-305 Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment %, along with costs. dollars ($ %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of interest at the rate of the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . ✔ other: Any claims made in the Complaint (1) for review of revocation or failure to grant Plaintiff a security clearance, (2) for damages from before April 1, 2009, or (3) for damages against the United States for libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment is entered by the Clerk to that effect, but said . judgment shall be without prejudice to any claims Mr. Saba may have against Interviewer 2-72777 or Investigator 2-A5718 in their individual capacities under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), or against the appropriate party for correction of his records under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 522a. This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. tried by Judge was reached. ✔ decided by Judge presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision Michael R. Merz on a motion for Dismissal filed by the Defendant's. JOHN P. HEHMAN Date: 01/10/2014 CLERK OF COURT s/TEMPANN THOMAS Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Western __________ DIVISION NIDAL SABA ___________________________________ Plaintiff Plaintiff vs U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE ___________________________________ AND SECURITY COMMAND, ET AL., Defendant Defendant : : : : : : : Case Number: 3:12-cv-305 NOTICE OF DISPOSAL PER SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO LOCAL RULES 79.2(a)&(b) 01/10/2014 The above captioned matter has been terminated on ________________________. If applicable to this case, the disposal date will be six (6) months from the above termination date. Rule 79.2(a) Withdrawal by Counsel: All depositions, exhibits or other materials filed in an action or offered in evidence shall not be considered part of the pleadings in the action, and unless otherwise ordered by the Court, shall be withdrawn by counsel without further Order within six (6) months after final termination of the action. Rule 79.2 (b) Disposal by the Clerk All depositions, exhibits or other materials not withdrawn by counsel shall be disposed of by the Clerk as waste at the expiration of the withdrawal period. JOHN P. HEHMAN, CLERK s/TEMPANN THOMAS By: _________________ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?