Richardson v. Huber Heights City Schools Board of Education et al

Filing 111

ORDER finding as moot 100 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 12/18/14. (pb1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DONALD RICHARDSON, et al., Plaintiffs, : BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HUBER HEIGHTS CITY SCHOOLS, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:12cv00342 : v. : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : : ORDER This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Huber Heights City School’s Motion to Enforce Court Order (Doc. #100), Dr. Craig D. Olson’s response and submission of letters and documents to the Court, and the record as a whole. Upon review of Defendant Huber Heights City School’s Motion and Dr. Olson’s letters and documents, the Court determines that the appropriate case-management procedure will be to permit the parties’ counsel of record to review the documents, under the terms of the prior Protective Order (Doc. #24), and to determine whether Dr. Olson must yet be deposed. If counsel deems necessary, they may submit a new or revised deposition subpoena to Dr. Olson and confer with him to schedule his deposition at a mutually convenient date and time. In light of this, the Court ORDERS that Defendant Huber Heights City School’s Motion to Enforce Court Order (Doc. #100) is DENIED as moot. Additionally, the Court directs: 1. The Clerk of Court to docket and file under seal Dr. Olson’s letters and documents; and 2. The Clerk of Court to serve copies of Dr. Olson’s letters and documents upon counsel of record, for attorneys’ eyes only and subject to the Court’s prior Protective Order. December 18, 2014 s/Sharon L. Ovington Sharon L. Ovington Chief United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?