Avis Rent A Car System et al v. City of Dayton, Ohio
Filing 88
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL, THE MOTIONS OF THE PLAINTIFFS FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES UNDER RULE 54( d)(2) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (DOC. # 82 AND # 83 ), WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL, SHOULD SAME REMAIN VIABLE AFTER THE DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 8/1/2014. (ead) Modified on 8/1/2014 (ead).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
