Nestick v. Unison Industries, LLC

Filing 14

ORDER re 11 , 10 - The Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel (doc. 10) filed by counsel for Defendant Unison Industries, LLC does not comply with S.D. Ohio Local Rule 83.4(c), and is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to be re-filed within TEN DAYS. The Notice of Appearance (doc. 11) is likewise deficient under the Local Rules because Attorney Caroline Koehler fails to note whether she or Attorney Kasey Bond will be the Trial Attorney in this case. The Notice of Appearance is therefore STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 07/26/13. (pb1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
DANIEL NESTICK,

:

Case No. 3:12-cv-403

:

District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Plaintiff,
vs.
UNISON INDUSTRIES, LLC,
Defendant.
:
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
The Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel (doc. 10) filed by counsel for
Defendant Unison Industries, LLC does not comply with S.D. Ohio Local Rule 83.4(c), and is
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to be re-filed within TEN DAYS.
The Notice of Appearance (doc. 11) is likewise deficient under the Local Rules because
Attorney Caroline Koehler fails to note whether she or Attorney Kasey Bond will be the Trial
Attorney in this case. The Notice of Appearance is therefore STRICKEN. The revised Notice
of Appearance or Notice of Substitution of Counsel shall state who appears as the Trial Attorney.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 26, 2013

s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge