DadgoStar et al v. St Croix Financial Center Inc et al

Filing 4

ORDER REGARDING REPRESENTATION OF ST. CROIX FINANCIAL CENTER, INC - St. Croix Financial is cautioned that the Court will not accept further filings on its behalf unless made by an attorney admitted to practice before this Court and filed electronically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/14/2012. (kpf1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON NICHOLAS MANSOOR DADGOSTAR, et al. Plaintiffs, : Case No. 3:12-mc-003 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz -vs: ST. CROIX FINANCIAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. ORDER REGARDING REPRESENTATION OF ST. CROIX FINANCIAL CENTER, INC This is a miscellaneous case in which United States Air Force employees Michael A. Sumner and Rebecca Felton seek to quash subpoenas duces tecum. The case is before the Court on tender to the Clerk for filing of St. Croix Financial Center’s Notice of Filing Notice of Motion to Intervene by Plaintiff United States Air Force. Because the proposed filing merely gives notice to this Court of an action taken by the Air Force in the Virgin Islands case out of which this matter arises, the Clerk is ordered to file the document. On March 1, 2012, St. Croix Financial submitted its Response to the Motion to Quash (Doc. No. 3). At that time the Clerk accepted the filing because it was tendered on the deadline, even though it was tendered on behalf of that entity by attorney Ryan C. Meade who is not a member of the bar of this Court. At that time, the Clerk advised Mr. Meade that he would need to apply for admission to our Bar pro hac vice and register for electronic filing. That has not yet occurred. St. 1 Croix Financial is cautioned that the Court will not accept further filings on its behalf unless made by an attorney admitted to practice before this Court and filed electronically. March 14, 2012. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?