DadgoStar et al v. St Croix Financial Center Inc et al
Filing
8
ORDER - Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/15/2012. (kpf1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
NICHOLAS MANSOOR DADGOSTAR,
et al.
Plaintiffs,
:
Case No. 3:12-mc-003
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
-vs:
ST. CROIX FINANCIAL CENTER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
WHEREAS, St. Croix Financial Center, Inc. is a Defendant in Nicholas Dadgostar, et.al. v.
St. Croix Financial Center, Inc. et.al., Case No. 10-cv-0028, on the docket of the United States
District Court for the Virgin Islands; and
WHEREAS, St. Croix Financial Center, Inc. served subpoenas, issued from the this Court
on Michael A. Sumner, Esq. and Rebecca Felton on or about February 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the United States filed a Motion to Quash these subpoenas in this Court on
February 6, 2012 (Doc. No. 1); and
WHEREAS, the parties have reached a resolution wherein the United States has agreed to
produce certain information, and St. Croix Financial Center, Inc. has agreed to withdraw its
subpoenas; and
WHEREAS, as part of that agreement, the parties have asked that the Court enter an order
requiring the production of certain documents requested by the subpoenas.
Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to this Court’s authority to enforce the
1
subpoenas, that the United States Air Force produce not later than March 25, 2012 any and all
witness narratives regarding the accident on April 19, 2009, in the U.S. Virgin Islands, involving
Nicholas Dadgostar. The United States Air Force is may redact any information deemed protected
by the Privacy Act or subject to national security concerns, and St. Croix Financial Center, Inc., may
request an in camera review of the unredacted witness narratives as may be necessary.
The Motion to Quash is denied as moot.
March 15, 2012.
s/ Michael R. Merz
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?