DadgoStar et al v. St Croix Financial Center Inc et al

Filing 8

ORDER - Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/15/2012. (kpf1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON NICHOLAS MANSOOR DADGOSTAR, et al. Plaintiffs, : Case No. 3:12-mc-003 District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz -vs: ST. CROIX FINANCIAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. ORDER WHEREAS, St. Croix Financial Center, Inc. is a Defendant in Nicholas Dadgostar, et.al. v. St. Croix Financial Center, Inc. et.al., Case No. 10-cv-0028, on the docket of the United States District Court for the Virgin Islands; and WHEREAS, St. Croix Financial Center, Inc. served subpoenas, issued from the this Court on Michael A. Sumner, Esq. and Rebecca Felton on or about February 1, 2012; and WHEREAS, the United States filed a Motion to Quash these subpoenas in this Court on February 6, 2012 (Doc. No. 1); and WHEREAS, the parties have reached a resolution wherein the United States has agreed to produce certain information, and St. Croix Financial Center, Inc. has agreed to withdraw its subpoenas; and WHEREAS, as part of that agreement, the parties have asked that the Court enter an order requiring the production of certain documents requested by the subpoenas. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to this Court’s authority to enforce the 1 subpoenas, that the United States Air Force produce not later than March 25, 2012 any and all witness narratives regarding the accident on April 19, 2009, in the U.S. Virgin Islands, involving Nicholas Dadgostar. The United States Air Force is may redact any information deemed protected by the Privacy Act or subject to national security concerns, and St. Croix Financial Center, Inc., may request an in camera review of the unredacted witness narratives as may be necessary. The Motion to Quash is denied as moot. March 15, 2012. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?