Miller v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 58

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 46 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 07/18/14. (pb1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
CARIN MILLER,
Plaintiff,

Case No.: 3:13-CV-90

vs.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,

District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Defendants.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 46)
The Court previously granted Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint. See June 16,
2014 Notation Order granting doc. 37. Trans Union, LLC, the only Defendant named in the
Amended Complaint, now moves for reconsideration of the Court's decision to permit the filing
of an Amended Complaint.

See docs. 46 (Trans Union's motion for reconsideration), 51

(Plaintiff's memorandum in opposition).
Recognizing that Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) provides leave to amend shall be "freely
give[n]," the Court DENIES Trans Union's motion for reconsideration. Trans Union remains
free to file a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint should it believe such a motion is
appropriate. The Court makes no finding on the merits, or lack thereof, of any such motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 18, 2014

s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge