Wynn v. Evanhoe & Associates et al

Filing 6

ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 5/22/2013 at 01:30 PM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 5/1/2013. (kf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

CAMILLA ANITA WYNN,

:

Case No. 3:13-cv-94

:

District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Plaintiff,
vs.
EVANHOE & ASSOCIATES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

:

ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

This pro se case was recently transferred to the undersigned by U.S. Magistrate Judge
Michael R. Merz. See doc. 5. The matter was referred to a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b) and General Order No. Day 12-03.
The record reflects that the preliminary pretrial conference set for May 9, 2013 has been
vacated due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. See doc. 5. Defendants filed
their Rule 26(f) Report; pro se Plaintiff, however, refused to participate in the Rule 26(f)
conference. See doc. 4.
The undersigned hereby RESCHEDULES the preliminary pretrial conference by
telephone for Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.1 Pro se Plaintiff and counsel for
Defendant are directed to call 1-877-336-1839, enter access code 2725365 and security code
123456, and wait for the Court to join the conference.

1

If the above-listed date or time conflicts with a previously set matter in another court, counsel with the
conflict may obtain a continuance by filing a motion that includes alternative dates on which all parties
will be available.

Plaintiff shall file her Rule 26(f) Report on or before May 15, 2013. Conversely,
Plaintiff may contact Defendants’ counsel to negotiate a discovery plan and an amendment of the
Rule 26(f) Report they filed. If no other Rule 26(f) Report is filed on or before May 15, 2013,
the Court will adopt the dates proposed by Defendants.
Plaintiff, as a pro se litigant without access to the Court’s electronic filing system, is
reminded that all documents filed with the Court must be contemporaneously mailed to the
counsel for Defendants, and must include a Certificate of Service indicating the date on which
the document was mailed. Plaintiff is also ordered to inform the Court and opposing counsel,
immediately and in writing, of any changes to her mailing address and/or telephone number. A
failure to do so may be cause for the Court to dismiss this case for Plaintiff’s lack of prosecution.
The Courts’ website (www.ohsd.uscourts.gov) contains copies of the Court’s Local
Rules, applicable General Orders, and the form for the Rule 26(f) Report. Plaintiff shall contact
the Clerk’s Office at [phone] if she does not have the ability to access the website.

May 1, 2013

s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge

2