Barber v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ORDER - Accordingly, the Commissioners motion 14 is now STAYED. This case shall proceed as follows: 1.) The Commissioners Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs Statement of Errors (doc. 10) shall be filed on or before March 3, 2014; and 2.) Plaintiffs Reply, if any, shall be filed by March 14, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 02/04/14. (pb1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON RONNIE BARBER, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:13-CV-110 vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, District Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman Defendants. ORDER Now before the Court is the Commissioner’s Motion for Voluntary Remand (doc. 14). The motion is opposed by Plaintiff. See doc. 15. The Commissioner seeks to voluntarily reverse the ALJ’s non-disability finding pursuant to the Fourth Sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and remand this matter to the ALJ for additional proceedings and reconsideration of Plaintiff’s disability status. See doc. 14 at PageID 98. The Court notes, first, that it will need to consider the appropriateness of the ALJ’s non-disability finding, and whether or not remand should occur here, among other issues, when it considers this case on the merits. Second, the Court also notes that the instant motion is opposed by Plaintiff. See doc. 15. For these reasons, the Court believes the most appropriate course here is not to rule on the motion at this time, but to consider this motion, hereafter, when the Court reviews this case on the merits. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s motion is now STAYED. This case shall proceed as follows: 1.) The Commissioner’s Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors (doc. 10) shall be filed on or before March 3, 2014; and 2.) Plaintiff’s Reply, if any, shall be filed by March 14, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. February 4, 2014 s/ Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?