Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
Filing 814
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING THE FOLLOWING WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING AFTER EXPERT DISCOVERY IS COMPLETED: HARRIS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #677 ); DEFENDANT COX MEDIA GROUP OHIO, INC.'S, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #679 ); WASTE MANAGEMENT OF OHIO, INC. 'S, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF BLAYLOCK TRUCKING COMPANY, INC. (DOC. #686 ); DEFENDANT THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #687 ); AND DEFENDANT FRANKLIN IRON AND METAL CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #698 ) DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING THE FOLLOWING: DEFENDANT DAYTON INDUSTRIAL DRUM, INC. 'S, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #690 ); DEFENDANT COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC. 'S, AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #695 ); AND FLOWSERVE CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #696 ); DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS AND CROSS-CLAIMS AGAINST THESE DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/29/17. (pb)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
