Call v. Riverside, City of et al
Filing
26
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY - IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is notconsummated. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 6/24/14. (ep)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
ROY A. CALL,
:
Plaintiff,
:
Case No. 3:13-cv-133
vs
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, OHIO et al.,
Defendants.
:
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY
The Court having been advised that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED
that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may,
upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not
consummated.
Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be
aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate
appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to
enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas M. Rose
Date: June 24, 2014
Thomas M. Rose, Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?