Call v. Riverside, City of et al

Filing 26

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY - IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is notconsummated. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 6/24/14. (ep)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

ROY A. CALL,

:

Plaintiff,

:
Case No. 3:13-cv-133

vs
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, OHIO et al.,

Defendants.

:

District Judge Thomas M. Rose

:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY
The Court having been advised that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED
that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may,
upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, reopen the action if settlement is not
consummated.
Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be
aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate
appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to
enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas M. Rose
Date: June 24, 2014
Thomas M. Rose, Judge
United States District Court