Moore v. Labor Ready

Filing 9

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S PRO SE MOTION (DOC. 7 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 5/28/2013. (ef)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
FREDRICK A. MOORE, JR.,

:

Case No. 3:13-cv-147

:

District Judge Walter H. Rice
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Plaintiff,
vs.
LABOR READY,
Defendant.
:
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S PRO SE MOTION (DOC. 7)
____________________________________________________________________________
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s pro se motion requesting a “continuance
while [he] gather[s] exhibits.” Doc. 7. The motion merits denial for two reasons. First,
Plaintiff failed to attach a memorandum in support of his motion, as required by Local Rule
7.2(a)(1). Second, to the extent Plaintiff is seeking time to file Objections to the Report and
Recommendation issued on May 17, 2013, his request is moot because he has already filed
Objections (doc. 6). Plaintiff’s motion (doc. 7) is thus DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 28, 2013

s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge