Indian Creek Acquisitions LLC v. SPM Flow Control Inc
Filing
33
ORDER granting 32 Motion to Dismiss - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), this action, including all of the claims that were or could have been asserted in the Plaintiffs Complaint [Doc. No. 1 , and all of the claims that were or could have been asserted in the Defendants Counterclaim [Doc. No. 9 are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, and that each party shall bear its own costs, attorneys fees and expenses. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 10/27/2014. (ead1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
INDIAN CREEK ACQUISITIONS, LLC
d/b/a MUTUAL TOOL,
:
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
vs.
:
:
S.P.M. FLOW CONTROL, INC. d/b/a WEIR :
SPM,
:
:
Defendant.
:
CASE NO. 3:13-CV-199
JUDGE ROSE
ORDER
This matter coming before the Court on Indian Creek Acquisitions, LLC d/b/a Mutual
Tool and S.P.M. Flow Control, Inc. d/b/a Weir SPM’s Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice
(the “Motion”); the Court having reviewed the Motion, and for good cause shown, the Motion is
hereby GRANTED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2),
this action, including all of the claims that were or could have been asserted in the Plaintiff’s
Complaint [Doc. No. 1], and all of the claims that were or could have been asserted in the
Defendant’s Counterclaim [Doc. No. 9] are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice, and that
each party shall bear its own costs, attorney’s fees and expenses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 27, 2014
*s/Thomas M. Rose
______________________________
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?