Dennis Baglama et al v. MWV Consumer and Office Products et al

Filing 45

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STAY RESPONSE TODEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 44 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 05/12/14. (pb1)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
DENNIS BAGLAMA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

Case No.: 3:13-cv-276

vs.
MWV CONSUMER AND OFFICE
PRODUCTS, et al.,

Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 44)
On May 12, 2014, the Court heard oral argument by both sides with respect to Plaintiffs’
motion, filed the same date, to extend Plaintiffs’ summary judgment opposition filing deadline
or, in the alternative, to stay a ruling on summary judgment so that the Court can entertain a
motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Doc. 44.
For good cause shown, the Court grants Plaintiffs an additional day in which to file their
summary judgment opposition memorandum. The Court makes no ruling on the motion for
leave at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 12, 2014

s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge