Hess v. City of Huber Heights Municipality et al

Filing 13

ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE: Pretrial Telephone Conference set for 1/6/2014 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 11/18/13. (cib1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON GLEN A. HESS, Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:13-CV-312 vs. CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS MUNICIPALITY, et al., District Judge Walter H. Rice Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman Defendants. ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE This pro se case was referred to the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). See General Order No. Day 12-03: Assignment and Reference to Magistrate Judges (eff. May 15, 2012). Accordingly, the undersigned, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, hereby schedules the preliminary pre-trial conference in this case for Monday, January 6, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. Pro se Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants are directed to call 1-877-336-1839, enter access code 2725365 and security code 123456, and wait for the Court to join the conference. If the above-listed date or time conflicts with a previously set matter in another court, counsel with the conflict may obtain a continuance by filing a motion that includes alternative dates on which all parties will be available. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, all parties to this case are required to: (1) make Initial Disclosures as required by Rule 26(a); and (2) confer with the other parties to plan discovery under Rule 26(f). Because Plaintiff is a pro se litigant, Defendants’ counsel are directed to initiate the telephone call to Plaintiff to plan discovery under Rule 26(f). The discovery conference must be held at least twenty-one days before the pre-trial conference with the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Not later than fourteen days after the discovery conference, the parties must submit the “Rule 26(f) Report of the Parties” to the Court in the form shown on the Court’s website. Unless otherwise agreed in the Rule 26(f) Report, the parties must make the disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) not later than fourteen days after the discovery conference. Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures are NOT to be filed with the Court. It is only necessary to file the Rule 26(f) Report of the Parties within the required time. Plaintiff, as a pro se litigant without access to the Court’s electronic filing system, is reminded that all documents filed with the Court must be contemporaneously mailed to the counsel for Defendants, and must include a Certificate of Service indicating the date on which the document was mailed. Plaintiff is also ordered to inform the Court and opposing counsel, immediately and in writing, of any changes to his mailing address and/or telephone number. A failure to do so may be cause for the Court to dismiss this case for Plaintiff’s lack of prosecution. The Court’s website (www.ohsd.uscourts.gov) contains copies of the Court’s Local Rules, applicable General Orders, and the form for the Rule 26(f) Report of the Parties. If you do not have the ability to access the website, please contact the Clerk’s Office at (937) 512-1400. November 18, 2013 s/ Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge   -2 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?