Hess v. City of Huber Heights Municipality et al

Filing 3

ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS - The United States Marshal is ORDERED to make service of process in this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 09/23/13. (pb1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON GLEN A. HESS, : Case No. 3:13-CV-312 : District Judge Walter H. Rice Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman Plaintiff, v. : CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS MUNICIPALITY, et al., Defendants. : ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, on September 20, 2013, and stayed service pending its § 1915 review. Pursuant to § 1915, the Court may dismiss a complaint upon finding (1) the claims are frivolous or malicious; (2) the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) Plaintiff seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). It is appropriate for the Court to conduct this review sua sponte prior to issuance of process “so as to spare prospective defendants the inconvenience and expense of answering such complaints.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989). Having conducted this § 1915 review, the Court finds, at this early juncture in the litigation, that dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint is not warranted. Accordingly, and having been advised by the Clerk of Courts that Plaintiff has already submitted the necessary service forms, the United States Marshal is ORDERED to make service of process in this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 23, 2013 s/Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?