Jewett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
7
ORDER REGARDING MANAGEMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J Newman on 12/5/13. (pb1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
NANCY JEWETT,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 3:13-CV-341
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.
ORDER REGARDING MANAGEMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
The parties are ORDERED to comply with all provisions set forth in Sixth Amended
Magistrate Judges’ General Order No. 11 (effective September 1, 2011). A copy of that General
Order can be found on the Court’s web site. To ensure that all parties are aware of, and fully
comply with, the General Order, a copy of the General Order is also attached hereto.
The parties are directed to pay particular attention to ¶ 2, which requires citations to the
administrative record refer to the PageID __ when the administrative record is filed
electronically. Briefs which are noncompliant with this provision may be stricken.
Also, as explained more fully in General Order No. 11, motions for extensions of time by either side - are strongly discouraged and are to be filed in only exceptional circumstances.
See General Order No. 11 at & 8.
Counsel for the Commissioner is also ORDERED as follows: Prior to the filing of a
Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Statement of Errors, the Commissioner’s counsel shall
review the administrative record (including all ALJ and Appeals Council decisions) and
determine whether or not a remand is appropriate. If so, the Commissioner shall file a motion
for remand in lieu of, and on or before the due date scheduled for, the Commissioner’s
Opposition Memorandum. All such motions for remand shall comply with S.D. Ohio Local Rule
7.3.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 5, 2013
s/ Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?