Winkle v. Loranger et al

Filing 25

RECOMMITTAL ORDER re 24 Objection to Report and Recommendations filed by Mark R Winkle. This matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 5/14/14. (ep)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
MARK R. WINKLE,
Plaintiff,

-

vs

:

Case No. 3:14-cv-020
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

-

CAROL S. LORANGER, et al.,

Defendants.

:

RECOMMITTAL ORDER

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff=s Objections (Doc. No. 24) to the Magistrate
Judge’s Supplemental Report and Recommendations (Doc. No. 22). Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72,
the Moving Defendants have a right to file a response to those Objections which is not due to be
filed until May 27, 2014.
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be
more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with
instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations
based on that analysis.
May 14, 2014.

s/Thomas M. Rose
___________________________
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge
1