Winkle v. Loranger et al

Filing 46

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 45 -The Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that Plaintiffs appeal (USCA Case No. 14-3758) is not taken in good faith and he should not be permitted to proceedin forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 8-19-2014. (de)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
MARK R. WINKLE,

:

Case No. 3:14-cv-20

Plaintiff,
- vs -

District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

CAROL LORANGER, et al.,

Defendant.

:

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
Michael R. Merz (Doc. #45), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b), and
noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
The Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that Plaintiff’s appeal
(USCA Case No. 14-3758) is not taken in good faith and he should not be permitted to proceed
in forma pauperis.
August 19, 2014

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge