Laning et al v. Doyle et al
Filing 34
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. #23) - CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Doc. #23, is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, as follows: All claims against Chief Schommer and Sergeant John Doe (Count Ill), and all claims brought against Officer Doyle in his official capacity, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; The following claims brought against Officer Doyle in his individual capacity are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Count 1: Unlawful Seizure, Detention, Search and Arrest Count IV: Count V: Count VII: Count X: claim) Malicious Prosecution False Arrest Assault and Battery (federal claim) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (federal The following claims brought against Officer Doyle in his individual capacity remain pending: Count II : Excessive Force (42 U.S.C. § 1983) Count VI: Retaliatory Arrest (42 U.S.C. § 1 983) Count VIII: Assault and Battery (state claim) Count IX: Loss of Consortium (state claim) Count X: claim) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (state Claim for compensatory and punitive damages The following claim brought against the City of Huber Heights remains pending: Count Ill (42 U.S.C. § 1983 only). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 2/18/2015. (srb1)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.