Rawlings v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 : The Report and Recommendations filed on June 30, 2015 (Doc. 9 ) is ADOPTED in full; the Commissioner's non-disability decision dated March 29, 2013, is VACATED; Plaintiff Mark Rawlings's appl ications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income are REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for payment of benefits consistent with this Decision and the Social Security Act; and, the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 7/20/15. (ep)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON MARK A. RAWLINGS, : Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:14cv00159 vs. : CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : DECISION AND ENTRY The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #9), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on June 30, 2015 (Doc. #9) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner’s non-disability decision dated March 29, 2013, is VACATED; 3. Plaintiff Mark Rawlings’s applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income are REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for payment of benefits consistent with this Decision and the Social Security Act; and, 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court s/Thomas M. Rose _________________________ Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?