McLaughlin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
12
ENTRY AND ORDER -The Joint Stipulation To Remand To The Commissioner 11 is GRANTED; (2) The Commissioners prior non-disability finding shall be VACATED, this case shall be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrativeproceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), including reevaluation and explanation of the weight given to the medical opinions, reevaluation of Plaintiff's substance abuse under SSR 13-2p, reconsideratio n of Plaintiff's credibility, reevaluation of Plaintiff's residual functional capacity, and, if necessary, to obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effect of the reassessed limitations on Plaintiff's occupational base; and this case is TERMINATED on this Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6-30-2015. (de)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
GEORGE MCLAUGHLIN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:14-cv-349
Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
ENTRY AND ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE JOINT STIPULATION
TO REMAND TO THE COMMISSIONER (DOC. 11); (2) VACATING THE PRIOR
NON-DISABILITY FINDING; (3) REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE
COMMISSIONER UNDER THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
FOR PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER; AND
(4) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S DOCKET
This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the Court on the parties’ Joint
Stipulation To Remand To The Commissioner (Doc. 11) pursuant to Sentence Four of Section
205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Due notice having been given, and the Court
being fully advised, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) The Joint Stipulation To Remand To The Commissioner (Doc. 11) is GRANTED;
(2) The Commissioner’s prior non-disability finding shall be VACATED;
(3) This case shall be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative
proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. § 405(g), including reevaluation and explanation of the weight given to the
medical opinions, reevaluation of Plaintiff’s substance abuse under SSR 13-2p,
reconsideration of Plaintiff’s credibility, reevaluation of Plaintiff’s residual functional
capacity, and, if necessary, to obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert
to clarify the effect of the reassessed limitations on Plaintiff’s occupational base; and
(4) This case is TERMINATED on this Court’s docket.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Tuesday, June 30, 2015.
s/Thomas M. Rose
________________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?