Smith v. City of Troy Ohio et al
Filing
96
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' FOURTH JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE. ECF 86 . Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 4/1/19. (ep)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Victor L. Smith,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:15-cv-054
Judge Thomas M. Rose
City of Troy, et al.,
Defendants.
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
IN PART DEFENDANTS’ FOURTH JOINT MOTION IN
LIMINE. ECF 86.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Fourth Joint Motion in Limine. ECF 86.
It is hereby ordered that:
A.
Major Ijames
Major Ijames has been identified as a witness, indeed an expert witness, by Defendant.
Ijames is not a consulting expert. Plaintiff will be permitted to present Major Ijames’ testimony
in his case in chief by way of presenting his deposition testimony.
B.
Officer Osting
Osting did not deploy his Taser, is not accused of acting contrary to the training he
received from Miami County, and is not an expert in Tasers. Plaintiff will not be permitted to
elicit from Osting information about his knowledge on the use of Tasers.
C.
Officer Gates
1
Plaintiff will be permitted to seek Officer Gates’ testimony on his personal understanding
of Smith. Gates will also be permitted to testify about what his training is on Taser use, the
training materials used to train him, his knowledge of, or lack thereof, his training materials and
whether he acted in accordance with his training on the date in question.
D.
Officers Hans Hohenstein, Chris Madigan, Kyle Knoop, Sgt. Richard Gumerlock
Plaintiff represents that he does not intend to call Kyle Knoop. Plaintiff will be
permitted to call Officers Hans Hohenstein, Chris Madigan, Sgt. Richard Gumerlock to testify
about the training the City of Troy provided in order to assist the jury in determining whether
Officer Gates acted in accordance with that training. This will include whether these officers
understood that Plaintiff suffers from a seizure disorder or epilepsy. Plaintiff may also inquire
as to their training on the X26 Taser.
E.
Andrew J. Vonderembse and David Reed
Plaintiff will not be permitted to ask either of these witnesses, who are EMTs, for a
medical diagnosis or causation. Plaintiff will be permitted to ask these witnesses about their
own personal knowledge of their involvement with this incident, the treatment they provided and
the reasons they gave it.
F.
Representatives from City of Troy and from Miami County, Ohio
Plaintiff does not respond to Defendants’ argument about “Representatives from …
Miami County, Ohio.” Therefore, the Court will preclude Plaintiffs from inquiring about
training issues from the Miami County representatives. However, because whether
Officer Gates adhered to his training is relevant, what that training consisted of is also
relevant. Plaintiff will be permitted to ask representatives from the City of Troy about
training and
2
procedures for law enforcement officials, procedures regarding use of force for law enforcement
officials; and, as regards the City of Troy, law enforcement training and procedures regarding
use of Taser equipment.
G.
Victor Smith
Out-of-court statements made by Smith to medical providers concerning his condition as
an epileptic will be permitted to the extent permitted by Federal Rule of Evidence 803(3) and (4).
In court, he will be permitted to testify about matters within his personal knowledge, such as a
history of seizures.
H.
Brittany Kerr, Myra Smith, Jerry Smith, Corey Kinnel, Sarah Christman, Derek
Mallery, Justin Beck
These witnesses will be permitted to testify concerning their factual observations of Victor
before and after the incident with police, should the matter reach the damages stage.
I.
Teri Stephenson
Under Ohio Revised Code § 4757.21 "Licensed Professional Clinical Counselor[s]” are
authorized to diagnose and treat.
If Plaintiff establishes that Stephenson is a Licensed
Professional Clinical Counselor, she will be permitted to testify about her treatment and diagnosis
of Plaintiff.
J.
Emergency Room staff, nurses and physicians from Upper Valley Medical Center;
Dr. Rajinder Singh, D.O.; Thomas K. Riddle, physician’s assistant
Because these individuals, like Stephenson, were not specially employed to provide expert
testimony in the case, they will be permitted to testify about their treatment and diagnosis of
Plaintiff, if qualified to do so, and will be limited to their personal knowledge.
3
K.
Ms. Claire Bagarus and/or Pamela Jacques and Other Third Parties
Because Plaintiff is not calling these witnesses, this part of Plaintiff’s motion is moot.
L.
Plaintiff’s Exhibits
The Court will presently reserve its ruling on Plaintiff’s Exhibits.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, April 1, 2019.
s/Thomas M. Rose
________________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?