Mullins et al v. Internal Revenue Service

Filing 37

ORDER DISMISSING CASE: TERMINATION ENTRY - The Court having been advised that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may,upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days, reopen the action if settlement is notconsummated.. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3/15/18. (ep)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

JAMES R. MULLINS, III, et al.,

:
:

Plaintiffs,
:
vs

Case No. 3:15-CV-106
District Judge Thomas M. Rose

:

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
Defendant.

:

:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY
The Court having been advised that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED
that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may,
upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days, reopen the action if settlement is not
consummated.
Parties may submit a substitute Judgment Entry once settlement is consummated within
the thirty (30) day period. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the
settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673
(1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will
retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas M. Rose
Date: March 15, 2018
Thomas M. Rose, Judge
United States District Court