Adams v. Montgomery County Childrens Services et al

Filing 5

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MERZ 3 OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 DISMISSING COMPLAINT 2 , AND TERMINATING CASE.Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1-19-2016. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Thomas Adams, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:15-cv-127 Judge Thomas M. Rose v. Montgomery County Childrens Services, Defendant. DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MERZ (DOC. 3), OVERRULING PETITIONER=S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE=S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, (DOC. 4), DISMISSING COMPLAINT, (DOC. 2), AND TERMINATING CASE. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Thomas Adam=s Objections to the Magistrate=s Report and Recommendations. (Doc. 4). The Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, (Doc. 3), recommends that the Court dismiss the Complaint (Doc. 2) with prejudice and certify that any appeal that could be taken would not be in good faith. As required by 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff=s objections, (Docs. 4), to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendations, (Doc. 3), are not well taken and they are hereby OVERRULED. Wherefore, the Court DISMISSES the Petition (Doc. 1) WITH PREJUDICE. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability and the Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore Plaintiff should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is ORDERED to terminate the instant case. DONE and ORDERED this Tuesday, January 19, 2016. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?