Klein v. Attorney General of the United States US Department of Justice et al

Filing 33

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (DOC. 32 ); (2) DISMISSING THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET: This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's mo tion for voluntary dismissal. Doc. 32 . Defendant does not oppose the motion. Accordingly, for good cause shown, Plaintiffs unopposed motion (doc. 32 ) is GRANTED. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and TERMINATED on the Courts docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 7/6/2016. (srb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON GERALDINE KLEIN, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:15-cv-134 vs. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Consent Case) Defendants. ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (DOC. 32); (2) DISMISSING THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND (3) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET This case is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal. Doc. 32. Defendant does not oppose the motion. 1 Accordingly, for good cause shown, Plaintiff’s unopposed motion (doc. 32) is GRANTED. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and TERMINATED on the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: July 6, 2016 1 s/ Michael J. Newman Michael J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge Counsel for Plaintiff, in the motion for voluntary dismissal, does not specifically indicate whether he consulted with counsel for Defendant prior to filing the motion and does not indicate whether or not the motion is opposed. Such failure violates S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.3. Nevertheless, the Court communicated with all counsel and counsel for Defendant has indicated to the Court and Plaintiff’s counsel that it does not intend to oppose the motion.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?