Wu v. Rodriguez et al
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 - The Report and Recommendations filed on August 24, 2015 8 is ADOPTED in full, Defendants' motion to remand 5 is GRANTED, this matter is REMANDED to USCIS for adjudication AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, a nd, in any event, no later than 120 DAYS from the date of this Order, Defendants SHALL file a notice with the Court when they have complied with this Order; and this case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-14-2015. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
YAN WU,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:15-cv-173
vs.
LEON RODRIGUEZ, et al.,
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 8)
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #8), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such
objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and
Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendation filed on August 24, 2015 (Doc. #8) is
ADOPTED in full;
2.
Defendants’ motion to remand (Doc. #5) is GRANTED;
3.
This matter is REMANDED to USCIS for adjudication AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE, and, in any event, no later than 120 DAYS from the date of
this Order;
4.
Defendants SHALL file a notice with the Court when they have complied
with this Order; and
5.
This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.
Date: September 14, 2015
*s/Thomas M. Rose
____________________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?