Kenyon v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

ENTRY AND ORDER granting 16 Unopposed Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees. The Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees 16 and ORDERS that the Commissioner shall pay attorney fees to Plaintiff's counsel in the requested amount of $23,516.50. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-6-2017. (de)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON BONNIE KENYON, : Case No. 3:15-cv-194 : Plaintiff, : Judge Thomas M. Rose : v. : : NANCY A. BERRYHILL, : Acting Commissioner of the Social : Security Administration, : : Defendant. : ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AUTHORIZATION OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (DOC. 16) ______________________________________________________________________________ This case is before the Court upon Plaintiff Bonnie Kenyon’s Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Doc. 16). Plaintiff requests that her counsel be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $23,516.50 under Section 406(b)(1). Of that award, Plaintiff’s counsel will reimburse Plaintiff $2,665.00 (excluding costs) for fees previously paid pursuant to the Court’s award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. No objection to the requested attorney fee award has been filed and the time do so has expired. WHEREFORE, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees (Doc. 16) and ORDERS that the Commissioner shall pay attorney fees to Plaintiff’s counsel in the requested amount of $23,516.50. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Wednesday, September 6, 2017. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?