Easterling v. Rice et al

Filing 15

ORDER denying 13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 9/8/2015. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
WARREN EASTERLING
Plaintiff,
v.
WALTER H. RICE, et al.
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case No. 3:15-CV-257
JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY

OPINION & ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for
Temporary Injunction, (Doc. 13), Plaintiff’s second motion requesting a temporary
injunction filed before this Court after his first motion requesting the same relief was
denied on August 18, 2015, (see Order, Doc. 11).
In the present motion, Plaintiff seeks the same relief he sought in his motion that
has already been denied by this Court: a temporary and preliminary injunction relieving
him of any requirements to obey an order issued by Defendant Judge Walter H. Rice,
barring Plaintiff from entering the United States District Court Building and Office
Complex, located at 200 W. 2nd Street, in Dayton, Ohio, (see Doc. 1-3), ceasing
enforcement” of the same, and removing all cases filed by Plaintiff from Defendants’
personal jurisdiction.
Plaintiff’s present motion makes essentially the same request for the same basic
reasons as his first motion requesting a temporary injunction; he merely adds new or
slightly altered arguments. Plaintiff’s first request was denied by this Court after a
thorough and comprehensive analysis reviewing Plaintiff’s motion in light of the

elements of Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Despite that well-reasoned
analysis foreclosing the relief Plaintiff seeks, he chose to ignore the Court’s decision and
file another motion on the exact same issue, as is his pattern of behavior in interacting
with the federal court system.
For the same reasons this Court announced in its prior Order on this matter, (see
Doc. 11), Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 13) hereby is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Algenon L. Marbley
ALGENON L. MARBLEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DATED: September 8, 2015

2