Jacks v. Commissioner of SSA

Filing 14

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 - The Court affirms the Commissioner's non-disability decision and orders the case terminated. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-27-2017. (de)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON CHELLI R. JACKS, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, : Case No. 3:15-cv-309 : : District Judge Thomas M. Rose : : Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman : : : : : : Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________________ DECISION AND ENTRY ____________________________________________________________________________________ This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff Chelli R. Jacks’ application for Disability Insurance Benefits and/or Supplemental Security Income. On February 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman entered a Report and Recommendation, which recommended that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. (Doc. 11) Plaintiff filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, in response to which the Commissioner rested on the arguments in her Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Statement of Specific Errors. (Docs. 9, 12, 13.) As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court made a de novo review of the record. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. 12) are not well taken and are hereby OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) in its entirety and AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s non-disability decision. The Clerk is ORDERED to terminate this case on the Court’s docket. DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, March 27, 2017. s/Thomas M. Rose ________________________________ THOMAS M. ROSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?