Jacks v. Commissioner of SSA
Filing
14
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 - The Court affirms the Commissioner's non-disability decision and orders the case terminated. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-27-2017. (de)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
CHELLI R. JACKS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE
SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
: Case No. 3:15-cv-309
:
: District Judge Thomas M. Rose
:
: Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
:
:
:
:
:
:
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________________________
DECISION AND ENTRY
____________________________________________________________________________________
This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of the decision of the Commissioner of the
Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff Chelli R. Jacks’ application for Disability Insurance
Benefits and/or Supplemental Security Income. On February 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge Michael J.
Newman entered a Report and Recommendation, which recommended that the Court affirm the
Commissioner’s decision. (Doc. 11) Plaintiff filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, in
response to which the Commissioner rested on the arguments in her Memorandum in Opposition to
Plaintiff’s Statement of Specific Errors. (Docs. 9, 12, 13.)
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court made a de novo review of
the record. Upon said review, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. 12) are not well taken
and are hereby OVERRULED. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) in its
entirety and AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s non-disability decision. The Clerk is ORDERED to
terminate this case on the Court’s docket.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, March 27, 2017.
s/Thomas M. Rose
________________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?