Williams v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections et al

Filing 46

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Report and Recommendations docketed on September 26, 2016 40 is ADOPTED in full, Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification and Motion for Appointment of Counsel 29 are DENIED, Plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Objections 45 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Thomas M. Rose on 10-26-2016. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON Melody L. Williams, Plaintiff, : Ohio Department Of Rehabilitation And Corrections, et al., Case No. 3:15cv00388 : vs. : District Judge Thomas M. Rose Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : : DECISION AND ENTRY Defendants. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #40), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations docketed on September 26, 2016 (Doc. #40) is ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #29) are DENIED; and 3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside Objections (Doc. #45) is DENIED as moot. October 26, 2016 THOMAS M. ROSE _______________________ Thomas M. Rose United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?