Moon v. Jones, Sheriff et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - No objections have been filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and the time for filing objections has expired. The Court hereby ORDERS that the Report and Recommendation 32 is ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff' s motion for voluntary dismissal 31 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, Defendants' motion to dismiss 24 is DENIED AS MOOT and this case is TERMINATED on the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-19-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
DARNELL WESLY MOON,
Case No. 3:15-cv-424
SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, et al.,
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #32), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b). No objections have been filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and the time for filing
objections has expired. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that: (1) the Report and
Recommendation (doc. 32) is ADOPTED in full; (2) Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal
(doc. 31) is GRANTED; (2) Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3)
Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 24) is DENIED AS MOOT and (4) this case is
TERMINATED on the Court’s docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 19, 2017
*s/Thomas M. Rose
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?