Driscoll v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 the parties' Joint Motion to Remand; the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff's favor; this matter is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties' stipulation; and the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 9-23-2016. (mcm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON LATANYA DRISCOLL, Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : Case No. 3:15-cv-00454 : : Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington : (by the parties’ full consent) : : : : : DECISION AND ENTRY This social security case is presently before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion For Remand. (Doc. #14). The parties agree that upon remand, the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge’s decision, and the Commissioner will conduct further proceedings and develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion For Remand (Doc. #14) is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor under Fed. R. Civ. P. 58; 3. This matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the parties’ stipulation; and 4. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 23, 2016 s/Sharon L. Ovington Sharon L. Ovington Chief United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?