Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Report and Recommendations filed on November 15, 2016 12 is ADOPTED in full, the Commissioner's non-disability finding be vacated, no finding be made as to whether Plaintiff Bonnie M. Wilson was under a disability within the meaning of the Social Security Act, this matter be REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry; and the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-6-2016. (de)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
BONNIE M. WILSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
: Case No. 3:16-cv-81
:
: District Judge Thomas M. Rose
: Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
DECISION AND ENTRY
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendations of
Chief United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #12), to whom this case
was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have
been filed and that the time for filing such objections, if any, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b),
has expired, this Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
It is therefore ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendations filed on November 15, 2016 (Doc. #12) is
ADOPTED in full;
2. The Commissioner’s non-disability finding be vacated;
3. No finding be made as to whether Plaintiff Bonnie M. Wilson was under a
“disability” within the meaning of the Social Security Act;
4. This matter be REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this
Decision and Entry; and
5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: December 6, 2016
s/Thomas M. Rose
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?