Lizard Apparel and Promotions LLC v. Impact Design LLC et al
Filing 7
AGREED ORDER RESOLVING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. RE: 3 - The parties hereby agree that Plaintiff was granted access on June 27, 2016 and will continue to be provided access to the webstores listed in the attached Exhibit A that are operated by Defendant. Said access is client administrative access to the webstores including access to payroll deductions data, allotment data, employee data, sales transactions data, reporting, and financial information from the listed websto res. Access will continue to be provided as it has previously been until July 15, 2016 at 11 :59 p.m. eastern time. Access will be granted specifically for Signature Healthcare including Silver Angels and SCH Medical Partners/Integritas (hereinaft er "Signature"). Access to the Signature webstore will remain in place to July 30, 2016 at 11 :59 p.m. due to Signature's required later transition date. If Signature transitions occur before July 30, 2016 then Plaintiff shall notify 72 hours before the transition date. Further, until that date, except for operating the webstores in their ordinary course of business, Defendant shall not change the content of the webstores without the prior written consent of Plainti ff. After July 15, 2016 and until July 30, Defendant shall continue to maintain and provide to Plaintiff, for each such webstore, the data described above pertaining to the period up to July 15, 2016. If either party breaches this agreement, th en counsel for the party shall provide written 24 hour notice of the breach before filing a motion with this court to enforce the terms of this order. Should the breach remain uncured after the 24 hour period from deliver of the notice then the party seeking compliance may file a motion with the court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 7/5/2016. (srb)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.