Prado v. Thomas et al

Filing 68

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF GLENDA JACQUELINE PRADO'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OFDEFENDANTS JEFFREY THOMAS, SEAN JOSEPH KESSEL, DONNA FALLIS, JIMMY COMBS, JASON TAVENER, KIRK KELLER A ND BRANDON HUDDLESON (DOC. # 62 ), AND OVERRULING WITHOUTPREJUDICE DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS TWO, THREE AND TWELVE TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 63 ); PLAINTIFF MAY, WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS OF THIS ENT RY, MOVE FOR LEAVE TO FILE INSTANTER AN AMENDED MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANDAUTHENTICATED EXHIBITS THERETO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL AND LOCAL RULES; IF PLAINTIFF OBTAINS LEAVE AND FILES AN AMENDED ME MORANDUM AND AUTHENTICATEDEXHIBITS, THEN DEFENDANTS MAY FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF WITHIN SEVEN DAYS THEREAFTER; IF PLAINTIFF DOES NOT AMEND HER MEMORANDUM OR AUTHENTICATE EXHIBITS, THEN DEFENDANTS MAY RENEW THEIR MOTION TO STRIKE AND OBJECTIONS; AMENDED PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER (DOC. # 50 ) VACATED IN PART;TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR MAY 17, 2018, AT 4:30 P.M.. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/4/18. (kma)

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?