Easterling v. Cassanos Inc et al
ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. NEWMAN (ECF 29 ), OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS (ECF 32 ), AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (ECF 26 ): Case remains CLOSED on this Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10/3/17. (ep)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Warren Easterling, r
Case No. 3:16-cv-340
Judge Thomas M. Rose
Cassano’s Inc., et al.,
RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J.
NEWMAN (ECF 29), OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS
(ECF 32), AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM JUDGMENT (ECF 26).
This case is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman’s Report and
Recommendations, (ECF 29), Plaintiff Warren Easterling=s Objections to the Report and
Recommendations, (ECF 32), and Plaintiff Warren Easterling=s Motion for Relief from Judgment.
(ECF 26). The Report and Recommendation would have the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has
made a de novo review of the record in this case, taking into consideration all objections. Upon
said review, the Court finds that the objections, (ECF 32), to Report and Recommendations, (ECF
29), are not well taken and they are hereby OVERRULED. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS IN
FULL the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendations. (ECF 29)
Easterling=s Motion for Relief from Judgment, (ECF 26), is DENIED.
The case remains
CLOSED on this Court’s docket.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, on Tuesday, October 3, 2017.
s/Thomas M. Rose
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?