Easterling v. Cassanos Inc et al

Filing 34

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. NEWMAN (ECF 29 ), OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS (ECF 32 ), AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (ECF 26 ): Case remains CLOSED on this Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10/3/17. (ep)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Warren Easterling, r
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 3:16-cv-340
Judge Thomas M. Rose

Cassano’s Inc., et al.,
Defendants.

ENTRY
AND
ORDER
ADOPTING
REPORT
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J.
NEWMAN (ECF 29), OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS
(ECF 32), AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM JUDGMENT (ECF 26).

This case is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman’s Report and
Recommendations, (ECF 29), Plaintiff Warren Easterling=s Objections to the Report and
Recommendations, (ECF 32), and Plaintiff Warren Easterling=s Motion for Relief from Judgment.
(ECF 26). The Report and Recommendation would have the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion.
As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has
made a de novo review of the record in this case, taking into consideration all objections. Upon
said review, the Court finds that the objections, (ECF 32), to Report and Recommendations, (ECF
29), are not well taken and they are hereby OVERRULED. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS IN
FULL the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendations. (ECF 29)
Easterling=s Motion for Relief from Judgment, (ECF 26), is DENIED.

Plaintiff Warren
The case remains

CLOSED on this Court’s docket.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, on Tuesday, October 3, 2017.

s/Thomas M. Rose
________________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2