Easterling v. Lynch
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION 20 , ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19 GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DIMSISS 12 AND TERMINATING CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-29-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Case No. 3:16-cv-375
Judge Thomas M. Rose
Mag. Judge Michael J. Newman
Jefferson B. Sessions,
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION, DOC.
20, ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DOC. 19,
GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, DOC. 12, AND
This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Objections (Doc. 20) to the Report and
Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. 19) recommending that
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) be granted; and this case be terminated on the Court’s
The Court has reviewed the findings of the Magistrate Judge and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '
636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), this Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds the Objections (Doc. 20) are not well-taken and,
for the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Newman’s Report and Recommendation, are hereby
Wherefore, the instant case is TERMINATED on the docket of the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western District at Dayton.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, on Tuesday, August 29, 2017.
s/Thomas M. Rose
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?