Ohio & Vicinity Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds, Inc. v. Gray Guy Group, LLC
Filing
8
ORDER granting 7 Motion for Default Judgment. Jurisdiction of this matter is being retained pending compliance with the Court's Order. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-17-2017. (de)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
OHIO & VICINITY CARPENTERS'
FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00499-TMR
Hon. Thomas M. Rose
v.
GRAY GUY GROUP,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________________/
ORDER FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT
GRAY GUY GROUP
Upon Default (Doc 6) being entered by this Court against Defendant GRAY GUY GROUP,
and the Court being otherwise fully advised of the premises;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
A.
Judgment is entered against Defendant GRAY GUY GROUP.
B.
That Defendant GRAY GUY GROUP open the company’s books and records within
14 days of entry of this Judgment in order for Plaintiff to conduct a complete audit through the
present to determine the amount due and owing Plaintiff in unpaid contributions.
C.
That the Court will amend its Judgment to include an amount determined due
pursuant to the audit. Further, the Court shall amend this Judgment to include the mandates of
29 USC §1132(g)(2) on all amounts determined due herein and the updated audit, upon further
submissions to this Honorable Court by Plaintiffs.
1
D.
That the Defendants are enjoined from any further breach of the Collective
Bargaining Agreement as same relates in any way to the payment of contributions to Plaintiff
Fund.
E.
That jurisdiction of this matter be retained pending compliance with the Court’s
orders.
March 17, 2017
s/Thomas M. Rose
_______________________________
District Court Judge
Drafted by:
Michael J. Asher (0071787)
Attorney for Plaintiffs
1000 Maccabees Center
25800 Northwestern Highway
Southfield, MI 48075-1000
248.746.0700
masher@swappc.com
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?