Hoermle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 , Plaintiff's counsel's initial motion 15 for attorney's fees under § 406(b)is DENIED as moot, Plaintiff's counsel's amended motion 16 is GRANTED and counsel is AWARDED & #036;7,609.00 in attorney's fees, Plaintiff's counsel shall reimburse Plaintiff, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS, the EAJA fee previously awarded to counsel, and this case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 7-8-2020. (de)
Case: 3:17-cv-00003-TMR-MJN Doc #: 18 Filed: 07/08/20 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: 2053
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
DANNY L. HOERMLE,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:17-cv-3
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY,
District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Michael J. Newman (Doc. #17), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and
noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #17) is ADOPTED in full;
2.
Plaintiff’s counsel’s initial motion (Doc. #15) for attorney’s fees under § 406(b)
is DENIED as moot;
3.
Plaintiff’s counsel’s amended motion (Doc. #16) is GRANTED (and counsel is
AWARDED $7,609.00 in attorney’s fees);
4.
Plaintiff’s counsel shall reimburse Plaintiff, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS,
the EAJA fee previously awarded to counsel; and
5.
This case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.
Date: July 8, 2020
___________________
*s/Thomas M. Rose
____________________________________
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?