Guglielmo v. Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners et al

Filing 187

ENTRY AND ORDER -If the parties plan to present live testimony by video from a remote location, then the Court will address the procedures and requirements for presenting such remote testimony at the Final Pretrial Conference that is scheduled for Ju ne 6, 2019. If the parties plan to present deposition testimony, including video, then the Court directs the parties' attention to General Order No. Day 12-01 at 3.2.2 (Depositions) regarding the Court's requirements to present testimony. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5-15-2019. (de)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JOSEPH GUGLIELMO,
Plaintiff

Case No. 3:17-cv-00006

-vsMONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO and the
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, et al.,

Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Sharon Ovington

Defendants

ENTRY AND ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________

In the Proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order, the parties ask about “the Court’s practice

concerning remote and video testimony.” (Doc. 165 at PAGEID#5201) If the parties plan to
present live testimony by video from a remote location, then the Court will address the
procedures and requirements for presenting such remote testimony at the Final Pretrial
Conference that is scheduled for June 6, 2019. If the parties plan to present deposition
testimony, including video, then the Court directs the parties’ attention to General Order No. Day
12-01 at 3.2.2 (“Depositions”) regarding the Court’s requirements to present testimony.
*s/Thomas M. Rose
_________________________________________
Judge Thomas M. Rose

Date: May 15, 2019